Market Pulse: Bitcoin's Security Under Debate
Speculation around quantum computing threats to Bitcoin is ramping up, shaking confidence just as risk-off sentiment pervades the market. But are headlines fueling more panic than warranted? Here’s where the debate stands, and what matters for holders...
Disclaimer: This is not financial or investment advice. You are responsible for any capital-related decisions you make, and only you are accountable for the results.
What happened?
Every now and then, familiar fear resurfaces. Supercomputers are coming and going to take down the Bitcoin network. Combine that with a risk-off environment, and that’s a recipe for panic. Here’s why it can be misleading…Bitcoin relies on cryptographic primitives like the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) for securing transactions and SHA-256 for proof-of-work mining. Quantum computing introduces potential vulnerabilities (heavy emphasis on “potential”), primarily through Shor's algorithm, which could efficiently derive private keys from public keys in ECDSA, and Grover's algorithm, which offers a quadratic speedup for hashing tasks like mining.
These threats have sparked intense debate, where opinions range from dismissal as overhyped FUD to urgent calls for protocol upgrades. Influential figures like Adam Back, a cryptographer, have labelled quantum concerns as "FUD," emphasising that Bitcoin does not use symmetric encryption and that practical threats are decades away.
Others, including analysts like Charles Edwards and developers discussing Bitcoin Improvement Proposals (BIPs), warn of risks to legacy addresses with exposed public keys (estimated at 20-30% of supply, including dormant Satoshi-era coins). Meaning whatever the fair value of BTC is today, the market needs to discount 20%-30% due to these risks.
It is important to point out that most of the comments, such as “quantum will break Bitcoin’s encryption”, seem to be overexaggeration since Bitcoin doesn’t use any encryption but relies on cryptography instead. Hence, we believe people are overreacting to risks that were known for many years.
However, of course, it is important to lobby for the adoption of soft forks that can make Bitcoin more secure, and we believe the Bitcoin community will eventually adopt them. However, real quantum computing threats seem to be far down the road, and only some of the supply will be under threat.
It is also worth noting that if quantum computers could suddenly break Bitcoin, they could also break:
- Bank authentication systems
- Government secure communications
- Military encryption
- The global internet security stack
Recommended from Cryptonary
