In Part 1, we broke down Ethereum and Solana as two distinct ecosystems with specific technological frameworks, user demographics, and philosophies. Now, we’ll take these insights further to look at actionable strategies for navigating these assets in the current cycle and beyond.

Ethereum and Solana have established themselves at similar ends of the crypto investment risk curve, but also they are very different offerings when you do the due diligence. Solana appeals to the short-term, high-risk generation looking for fast results and immediate returns, while Ethereum is built for those with a long-term vision, institutions, and serious investors valuing security, scalability, and resilience.
In Part 2, we’ll break down why Solana is best suited for high-reward swing trades and why Ethereum holds its ground as a solid, long-term asset.
Let’s go!
With everything on a single layer, Solana offers a fast, straightforward experience—no extra steps, no high fees. It’s built for on-the-go trading, perfect for those who want speed and simplicity. No need to mess with multiple layers or wait around for transactions to clear. Solana’s streamlined setup follows the same addictive formula that made apps like TikTok and Netflix popular.
This structure is ideal for meme trading, which is set to pick up as we move deeper into the cycle. With capital flow showing demand for SOL as a way to access meme coins, Solana’s positioned as the go-to chain for this crowd, and sentiment this cycle confirms it.
On top of that, Solana’s inflationary token model, at roughly 5% annually, keeps tokens accessible at the expense of scarcity and fits the high-speed trading narrative of SOL. In a high-growth market, this setup gives investors multiple scaling opportunities and plenty of swings without needing leverage to capture solid returns which have seen already which we will touch on later.
Thus, Ethereum is seen as a “global settlement layer” and has attracted backing from major players like BlackRock, UBS, and CoinBase, who see it as an ideal platform for tokenizing real-world assets. This modular setup, while slightly more complex, offers scalability without sacrificing security. It’s what institutions trust for high-value projects, ensuring Ethereum’s role as the backbone for decentralised finance. We can see it by looking at average revenue per user chart: an average Ethereum users generates roughly $40 in revenue

In contrast, Solana generates roughly $1.2 per user. Thus, this solidifies further our take that there are significant difference in audiences these two ecosystems attract. Ethereum is for big players and institutions, while Solana is perfect for retail participants.
Further, Ethereum’s deflationary tokenomics, established with EIP-1559, burn a portion of transaction fees, creating a long-term store of value. Since the upgrade, Ethereum’s revenue increased significantly, reinforcing its role as a trusted, long-term asset. This deflationary model appeals to the sophisticated, long-term investor looking for stability, not high-frequency trading.
The best metric to quantify the profitability or “value-accrual” for tokenholders that we found is the earnings. Earnings is how much tokens were burnt (accrued to tokenholders) versus how much tokens were inflated (dilution for tokenholders). When earnings are positive more tokens were burnt than added to supply. When they are negative, more tokens were added to the supply than burnt.
Let’s start with Ethereum. In the last 365 days the earnings have been net negative, diluting shareholders by roughly $600m. That represents roughly 0.16% inflation, which is very insignificant.

However, Ethereum is still profitable if we measure it since the “Merge”, an upgrade that made Ethereum deflationary. While Bitcoin, an asset that is widely recognised as store of value, inflated by 1.5%, Ethereum deflated by 0.04%.

This highlights the attraction of Ethereum for long-term investors. If you’re coming in with a long-term horizon and significant capital, Ethereum is naturally going to stand out more. Sure, we’ve seen a dip in earnings since August, but Ethereum has had stretches this year where earnings were positive. This shows it can generate real returns depending on blockchain activity, and it’s likely to swing back to positive territory when demand spikes again.
On the other hand, Solana’s earnings tell a different story. The chart shows a consistent trend of dilution, with no signs of slowing down. Solana’s earnings steadily move downward, almost forming a pattern that doesn’t offer much reassurance for long-term value. For big-money, long-term investors, this consistent dilution would be a red flag, making Solana less attractive as a stable investment compared to Ethereum.

With Ethereum, we’re looking at a different mentality altogether—a shift toward a store-of-value asset similar to Bitcoin. Ethereum’s robustness, security, and reputation have established it as a multi-cycle hold, an asset with the resilience to withstand market shifts. Its consistent adoption by institutions reinforces this, aligning Ethereum with the values of “smart money” investors who prioritise security, sustainability, and long-term growth.

Ethereum, on the other hand, has achieved a 65% move, which might seem underwhelming to those seeking aggressive returns, but it aligns with its role as a stable, long-term hold.

In a bull market, you wouldn’t be constantly re-entering Ethereum; the returns don’t justify it for short-term gains. Instead, Ethereum suits an accumulation strategy with strategic entries, such as our $2,200 low-leverage trade recommendation we put out to our members a few months ago. This approach fits Ethereum’s profile as an asset that benefits from being held through cycles potentially depending on your time horizon. Meanwhile, Solana’s volatility provides multiple points for scaling in, leveraging its high upside in a market cycle.
Solana’s year-to-date performance highlights its role as a swing trade asset, allowing you to scale in on pullbacks and capture multiple moves to the upside. With high volatility, leverage becomes an option, but often just holding through its swings can deliver solid returns.
Given its potential for substantial gains relative to its risk, Solana is an asset you’d likely rotate out of as the cycle ends—shifting into BTC or ETH as long-term holds when things top out again. Trade the trade, accumulate the investment, and leverage their qualities against each other—that’s the mark of a true market player.
Adopting Michael Saylor’s mindset of “buy the top forever” applies here—Ethereum is a multi-cycle hold, where the focus is on consistent accumulation rather than chasing short-term moves. As Ethereum continues to cement its place as the foundation for decentralised finance, this is the asset to park capital in for those looking to build wealth over time.
On the other hand, Ethereum offers stability and a secure foundation for those thinking in cycles, not days. Its robust structure, growing institutional adoption, and deflationary setup make it the asset to hold for the long game. It is a native home for decentralised finance and is consider to be the “global settlement layer”
The takeaway? Solana is a winner and trade for this cycle, but accumulate Ethereum for the future as it has the best economic model in the entire market. Use Solana’s volatility and short-term gains to your advantage, while letting Ethereum serve as the bedrock of your portfolio for years to come. To many of you view them the same. We hope this shows you they are not.
Peace! Cryptonary, OUT