
We’ve made decisive changes, shedding some assets to narrow our focus on those with the most compelling potential for growth.
Ready to know how are we playing the next leg up in the bull market?
Let’s dive in…
As we anticipated, the platform started burning SNX from its fees, creating deflationary pressure on the price. However, the momentum was short-term and faded in the last several months.

The annual burn rate is roughly 0.1% of the supply. In short, fees are not substantial enough to present a compelling investment opportunity. With key ecosystem players such as Lyra and Kwenta moving away from Synthetix’s liquidity and increased competition from HyperLiquid, we don’t see strong reasons for fees to catch up soon.
For these reasons, we are removing SNX from our CPRO picks.
The lack of communication from the team is also concerning. On many occasions on X Spaces, the team's engagement regarding Synapse Chain developments has often lacked details, with responses tending towards broad reassurances rather than specific updates or concrete action plans.
For the reasons above, we are removing SYN from CPro picks.
However, while it has been hot for several months ago, the PolitiFi category has lost its steam. Further, Donald Trump’s winning odds aren’t as strong as they used to be.

There is still an upside for Tremp if Donald Trump manages to win the elections but the risk-reward ratio isn’t attractive anymore. For these reasons, we are removing Tremp from CPro picks.
While our initial thesis about OP remains valid—specifically, its role as a proxy for the success of Base and the broader adoption by institutional players such as BlackRock—our current assessment points to alternative assets that offer a better risk-to-reward profile.
If new developments or catalysts emerge that reaffirm or strengthen OP’s potential, particularly in connection with ETH’s performance or institutional adoption, we are prepared to quickly reassess and reintroduce it into our CPro picks.
However, OP will be removed from our list of selected assets for now.
As previously mentioned, our investment strategy is currently focused on a more concentrated portfolio approach. This involves prioritising assets that present the most compelling opportunities for growth and returns in the current market landscape. By narrowing our focus, we aim to allocate resources more efficiently, maximizing potential gains from top-performing assets.
This does not imply that injective is a poor investment choice. We recognise the intrinsic value that Injective brings to the table and believe it holds significant promise for continued appreciation. However, we are betting on the best candidates within the category, and for those reasons, we are removing INJ from our CPro picks for now.
However, despite these strengths, Avalanche is not currently leading the pack among L1s. The competition is intense, with several other L1 platforms demonstrating superior performance metrics, broader adoption rates, or a more innovative ecosystem at this moment. Thus, while AVAX is one of the reliable bets on the market among L1s, it is not the best at the moment.
We will remain dynamic and will bring it back if it proves itself to be a potential winner in the category.
We remain committed to staying agile, ready to pivot back to these assets anytime should new catalysts emerge. Our goal is to be dynamic and continually evaluate the market, ensuring our picks are not only relevant but positioned to capture the best opportunities the market has to offer.
Peace!
Cryptonary, OUT!