And if you think you do, you might be slightly delusional.
Welcome to the world of LSD-Fi stablecoins!
But who are we backing in this space?

Like all LSD-Fi protocols, participants can deposit their ETH derivative tokens into the protocol to earn additional yield. But where does that yield come from? Well, those tokens are used as collateral to mint eUSD - Lybra’s native stablecoin.
The neat part is that ETH derivative tokens are yield-generating, with yield coming from ETH staking. This means that eUSD holders benefit from this yield - consider it like “trickle-down” economics.
1.5 stETH (or other ETH derivatives) is required to back the equivalent of 1 ETH worth of eUSD. Thus, $1000 worth of eUSD benefits from an outsized share of the Ethereum staking yield compared to simply staking $1000 worth of ETH—50% more yield, to be exact.
Another key factor is that Lybra V2 leverages LayerZero’s omnichain communication protocol to enable peUSD to exist natively on all chains that LayerZero supports. peUSD is the multi-chain version of eUSD and is backed directly 1:1 by eUSD.
So, we end up with a multi-chain, decentralised, yield-generating stablecoin with no ties to centralised entities or TradFi yield products.
The key issue that stablecoin issuers face is that by taking in fiat USD on a 1:1 basis, that money becomes unproductive.
Inflation is a killer - it’s why the likes of MakerDAO (DAI) and Tether (USDT) have been backing their stablecoins with US T-Bills, which offer a yield.
By using staked ETH as collateral, which is already yield-generating, eUSD becomes entirely crypto-native. Backed by crypto and crypto-native yield.
With Lybra, there is no centralised point of failure. One can make the argument that reliance on LSD providers, like Lido and Frax, etc., for collateral, could be a “centralised” point of failure. But we would much rather take our chances with them than with the US and other regulators.

Launching a few months into the LSD-Fi trend in 2023, eUSD was the top dog within the LSD stablecoin sector until November 2023, when Prisma’s mkUSD overtook it. Although the entire LSD-Fi sector has not been at the forefront of attention in recent weeks, it’s clear demand is constant as there are still over $105 million eUSD circulating.

TVL has remained consistent (the dip was caused by the migration from V1 to V2, as many tokens were stuck in V1 and were not registered on DeFiLlama). This reflects the quantity of eUSD in circulation, multiplied by 1.5x, plus LBR staking.
How is this possible? Where do the fees/revenue come from? How does the protocol maintain operations?
Although it doesn’t cost anything (other than gas) to mint/burn eUSD, a 1.5% fee is applied to all eUSD in circulation. Lybra can offer all fees to esLBR token holders because of the revenue generated by Ethereum staking. Essentially, the Ethereum network fuels the LBR economy.
The LBR tokenomics are as follows:
Token emissions are fairly linear, and the majority of emissions should be complete towards Q3/4 of this year. We’re not too concerned about inflation due to the low market cap/FDV. However, in the valuation calculation, we will base targets on FDV.
Overall, tokenomics are sound, and we think it’s fair to consider the relationship between LBR and Lybra to be similar to that between LDO and Lido. As TVL grows, the desire/necessity to participate in governance grows. Hence, people buy LDO (LBR, in this case), and the price increases.
The total value of all LSD-Fi protocols is only around $1.6 billion. Compare this with the $50.3 billion TVL for LSD protocols (Lido, Frax, RocketPool, etc.), and it becomes clear that there is still a considerable amount of sidelined capital waiting to be deployed into LSD-Fi that already exists in LSD protocols (across all chains).
LSD-Fi represents a mere 3.8% of the total liquid staking market.
We feel it is a reasonable assumption that LSD-Fi participation will increase to 20% of all LSD TVL, which translates to an LSD-Fi TVL of $10.1 billion.
Assuming that Lybra will retain the same market share of 18.75%, this gives a projected Lybra TVL of $1.89 billion.
Given a ratio of 0.135 (as explained above), this suggests that LBR’s market cap can reach $255 million, purely based on increased LSD-Fi participation.
Since we’re using a base of ~100 million circulating LBR, we can conservatively project a price per LBR of $2.55.
Now, this seems low - because it is.
We haven’t considered the stablecoin market - Lybra’s target market - which stands at a total market cap of $131 billion. Additionally, we expect the total crypto market to increase 2-3x this year, which means increased participation across the board and a higher demand for stablecoins.
Given these figures, we will apply some multiples to the initial valuation to reach the final figures:
When the market takes a turn for the worst, as it will occasionally, everyone exits to stablecoins.
Lybra has a first-mover advantage in the LSD-Fi stablecoin game, and we’re confident they won’t let that slide.
Remember - LSD-Fi is in its infancy. If you are reading about it now, you are very likely an early adopter.
Bitcoin started 2024 with a strong move up, but what does the rest of 2024 have in stock for your portfolio?Check out Cryptonary's 2024 projections.